Drawing for VIET ITALIA

USPTO serial 79013250

VIET ITALIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3352529Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIET ITALIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Sapone

William J. Sapone Ware Fressola Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5,P.O. Box 224MONROE, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Woodworking machinery, namely wide belt sanding machines, brushing sanding machines, electric sanders, air-operated sanders, polishing machines for use in polishing wood, profile polishing machines, namely, polishing machines for use in polishing profiles, namely, sections of wood and panels made of wood by-productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 19, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Dec 19, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Dec 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 4, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Dec 4, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance