Drawing for S BEAT

USPTO serial 79013267

S BEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3220244Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S BEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph E. Locher

RALPH E LOCHER LERNER GREENBERG STEMER LLPPO BOX 2480HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in upgrading firmware; computer hardware; computer peripherals; computer memory modules; sound and image reproduction apparatuses, namely, digital audio players, digital video players and multimedia playersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Installation, setup, maintenance and repair of computer equipment, computer accessories, computer peripherals, computer memory modules, and multimedia apparatuses, namely, digital audio players, digital video players and multimedia playersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Information technology consulting services; and application service provider featuring software for providing an on-line database in the field of computer software for use in upgrading firmwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 18, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 17, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 25, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 17, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 19, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 29, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Jan 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance