Drawing for CONERGY

USPTO serial 79013300

CONERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3177242Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2006
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie N. Nafziger

Taylor Wessing Dorsey & Whitney LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500Minneapolis, MS 55402-1498

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006[ Portable metal buildings; goods of common metal, namely, metal mounting systems comprised of metal shelves, metal shelf brackets, metal shelf support bars, metal bolts, rivets, screws and metal threaded fasteners; metal framework; metal fastening systems, namely, metal bolts, rivets, screws and metal threaded fasteners ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Electronic components being parts for solar installations, namely, solar cells and photovoltaic solar modulesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011[ Solar thermal installations for heat and energy production, namely, solar thermal modules, solar thermal energy storage plants and solar thermal energy power plants; wind energy power plants; photovoltaic energy power plants ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Installation services, namely, [ installation of solar thermal energy power plants, solar thermal energy storage plants, wind energy power plants, ] photovoltaic energy power plants; repair, construction and maintenance of renewable energy installationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
038[ Internet services, namely, transmission of information and data relating to renewable energy installations via electronic communications networks and global computer networks ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040[ Renewable energy production; ] providing information in the field of renewable energy, namely, providing information about how renewable energy production plants work, providing information on the sources of renewable energy, providing information on the process for making renewable energy and providing information in the nature of reports detailing the amount of renewable energy producedSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042[ Computer programming for others of machines for rain water installations, pumps, solar installations, solar thermal installations, wind energy installations, photovoltaic installations, photovoltaic modules and renewable energy installations; computer consultancy, namely, a computer consultancy in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for pumps, solar installations, solar thermal installations, wind energy installations, photovoltaic installations, photovoltaic modules and renewable energy installations; product research and development in the field of renewable energy products; providing engineering data on renewable energy installations ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 25, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Sep 22, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 22, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 22, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 5, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Jun 27, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 2, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 26, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 26, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 17, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 30, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 20, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 20, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 28, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
May 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 18, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2005ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 24, 2005CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Oct 20, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance