USPTO serial 79013300
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie N. Nafziger
Taylor Wessing Dorsey & Whitney LLP50 South Sixth StreetSuite 1500Minneapolis, MS 55402-1498| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Portable metal buildings; goods of common metal, namely, metal mounting systems comprised of metal shelves, metal shelf brackets, metal shelf support bars, metal bolts, rivets, screws and metal threaded fasteners; metal framework; metal fastening systems, namely, metal bolts, rivets, screws and metal threaded fasteners ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electronic components being parts for solar installations, namely, solar cells and photovoltaic solar modules | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ Solar thermal installations for heat and energy production, namely, solar thermal modules, solar thermal energy storage plants and solar thermal energy power plants; wind energy power plants; photovoltaic energy power plants ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation services, namely, [ installation of solar thermal energy power plants, solar thermal energy storage plants, wind energy power plants, ] photovoltaic energy power plants; repair, construction and maintenance of renewable energy installations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | [ Internet services, namely, transmission of information and data relating to renewable energy installations via electronic communications networks and global computer networks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | [ Renewable energy production; ] providing information in the field of renewable energy, namely, providing information about how renewable energy production plants work, providing information on the sources of renewable energy, providing information on the process for making renewable energy and providing information in the nature of reports detailing the amount of renewable energy produced | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Computer programming for others of machines for rain water installations, pumps, solar installations, solar thermal installations, wind energy installations, photovoltaic installations, photovoltaic modules and renewable energy installations; computer consultancy, namely, a computer consultancy in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for pumps, solar installations, solar thermal installations, wind energy installations, photovoltaic installations, photovoltaic modules and renewable energy installations; product research and development in the field of renewable energy products; providing engineering data on renewable energy installations ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |