Drawing for NILCO

USPTO serial 79013313

NILCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NILCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Detergents, other than for use in manufacturing operations and for medical purposes; soaps; shampoos for carpets; polish for flooring; dirt and varnish removing preparations; cleaning preparations for laundry; detergents for dishwasher; polishes for dishwasher; disinfectants for hand cleaning, surfaces, kitchen and bathrooms; softeners for laundry; rust removing preparations; stain removers, cleaning preparations for silver; cleaning chalk; bleaching preparationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2012DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 28, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance