USPTO serial 79013346
Serial No. 79013346
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3228021Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2007
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with Serial No. 79013346?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeanne Hamburg
Jeanne Hamburg Norris McLaughlin, P.A.7 Times Square, 21st FloorNew York, NY 10036-6524United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | [ Beers, soft drinks, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages not including tomato juice, extracts of hops for making beer, whey beverages ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Sake; [ western liquors, alcoholic beverages of fruit, Chinese liquors and flavored tonic liquors, namely, whisky, vodka, gin, alcoholic bitters, brandy, rum, liquors, arrack, ] alcoholic extracts [ absinthe liquor, cocktails, curacao, strawberry wine, perry, grape wine, cider, tonic liquor flavored with plum extracts, wild grape wine, kirsch, vermouth, champagne, anise liquor, aperitifs, alcoholic fruit extracts, wine coolers, citron wine, wine, Chinese mixed liquors, tonic sweet grape wine containing extracts from ginseng and cinchona bark, hydromel mead, tonic liquor containing herb extracts, tonic liquor flavored with pine needle extracts, tonic liquor containing mamushi-snake extracts, viper liquor, peppermint liquors, tiger bone liquor ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 6, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |