Drawing for DAVOS

USPTO serial 79013375

DAVOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAVOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW WILFORD

ANDREW WILDORD THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE # 900BRONX, NY 10471-2138UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Sheets of rubber for footwear solesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Rubber soles and heels for footwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 31, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 14, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 24, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance