Drawing for EQUADEL

USPTO serial 79013392

EQUADEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194383Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQUADEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milena S. Mishev

Milena S. Mishev McCarthy Fungar LLP11 Martine Avenue12th FloorWhite Plains, NY 10606-1934

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps for spraying liquidsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
010Applicators for medical use, namely, apparatus and instruments to be used for local application of pharmaceutical products and medicines, namely, sprayers for the administration of medicines and pharmaceutical liquidsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 2, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 20, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 13, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 4, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 3, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 25, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 24, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance