Drawing for SOLARVENTI

USPTO serial 79013406

SOLARVENTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3268484Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 24, 2007
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLARVENTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica P. McCabe

Monica P. McCabe Phillips Nizer LLP485 Lexington Avenue14th FloorNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011SOLAR HEATING, DEHUMIDIFICATION AND VENTILATION APPARATUS, NAMELY, AIR SOLAR COLLECTION PANELS, AIR SOLAR PANEL ENCASEMENTS, PV PANELS, DUCTING CONDUITS AND FANS SOLD AS A UNIT AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFORESECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 25, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 14, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 14, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 13, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 5, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 9, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 7, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Jun 17, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 17, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 23, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 13, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 13, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 5, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 5, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 28, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 23, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 22, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 3, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 31, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance