Drawing for COMVAT

USPTO serial 79013443

COMVAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202286Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with COMVAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne and Schwab666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY FLANGES, INTERMEDIATE RINGS, END PIECES OF TUBES, MEMBRANES AND MEMBRANE BELLOWS, JUNCTIONS FOR PIPES AND INTERMEDIATE PIPE PIECES; ALL FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, CRYO-TECHNOLOGY, FLUID TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH IN THESE FIELDSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 23, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 12, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 4, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 28, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Nov 17, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 13, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 23, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 29, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Oct 10, 2014RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Oct 10, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 2, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 2, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance