Drawing for Serial No. 79013446

USPTO serial 79013446

Serial No. 79013446

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202287Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79013446?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN P. MURTAUGH

JOHN P. MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 EAST 9TH STREET, SUITE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007accessories for hydro-cleaning, namely, guns, launchers, sprinklers, valves, injectors[, pumps, ]high pressure hoses and extension handles, all parts of power-operated sprayersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 1, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 2, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 2, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Apr 25, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 25, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 22, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 24, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 31, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 31, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 31, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 31, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 20, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 6, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance