Drawing for HERKUPAK

USPTO serial 79013469

HERKUPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3107115Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 2006
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with HERKUPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP212 Carnegie Center, Suite 400Princeton, NJ 08540United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Propagation trays for plants made of plasticACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 23, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 15, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 21, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 20, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 26, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 3, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 15, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 11, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance