Drawing for LIGNADECOR

USPTO serial 79013518

LIGNADECOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228023Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGNADECOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

John S. Egbert Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Films and sheets, namely, paper substrates laminated or impregnated with resins, in particular for the production of floors, such as laminate floors, and for coating furniture as semi-finished products, synthetic edge banding in the nature of wood veneers; synthetic flooring, laminate flooring, underlay for laminate flooring, wooden flooring, parquet wooden flooring, underlay for parquet wooden flooringSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 4, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 13, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 13, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 20, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 9, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 6, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Dec 6, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 12, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 12, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 23, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance