Drawing for CLEAR ALL-IN-ONE

USPTO serial 79013545

CLEAR ALL-IN-ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340075Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAR ALL-IN-ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Irene Y. Lee

IRENE Y. LEE RUSS AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD.,SUITE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Contact lens care preparations in solution and tablet form for disinfecting, cleaning, wetting, cushioning, soaking or rinsing contact lenses; liquid solutions which rewet, lubricate, rehydrate or relieve dryness in the eyes or contact lenses; eye moisturizers for medical use; ocular decongestants for medical use; and ocular ointments for medical use, which relieve irritation, relieve redness, relieve discomfort, or sootheSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 31, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 31, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 31, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 22, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Oct 22, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance