USPTO serial 79013549
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $2,600
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
Miriam D. Trudell Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700Denver, CO 80205United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPER, CARDBOARD AND STATIONERY, AND GOODS MADE OF PAPER AND CARDBOARD, NAMELY, ADDRESS LABELS, ADDRESS LISTS, ADDRESS PLATES, ADHESIVE LABELS, ADHESIVE NOTE PADS, ADHESIVE NOTE PAPER, ADHESIVE PATCHES TO BE PRINTED WITH AN INDIVIDUAL WEARER'S MEDICAL AND PERSONAL INFORMATION, APPOINTMENT BOOKS, BINDERS FOR OFFICE USE, BLANK CARDS, BLANK NOTE CARDS, BLANK OR PARTIALLY PRINTED PAPER LABELS, BOOK COVERS, BOOK-COVER PAPER, BOXES, BUSINESS CARDS, CALENDARS, COLLAPSIBLE BOXES, CORRESPONDENCE HOLDERS, DAILY PLANNERS, GARBAGE BAGS, GIFT CARDS, GIFT WRAP PAPERS, HAT BOXES, LABEL PAPER, MEMO PADS, PACKING CARDBOARD CONTAINERS, PACKING PAPER, BADGES, BAGS, SACKS, DROP CLOTHS, GIFT BAGS, TAGS, WINE GIFT BAGS, SHOPPING BAGS, AND STICKERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER AND GOODS MADE OF LEATHER, NAMELY, BAGS AND HOLDALLS FOR SPORTS CLOTHING, BAGS FOR UMBRELLAS, BARREL BAGS, BEACH BAGS, BELT BAGS, BOOK BAGS, BRIEF BAGS, BRIEFCASES, BUSINESS CARD CASES, CARRYING CASES, CARRY-ALL BAGS, COIN PURSES, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, HANDBAGS, KEY BAGS, SHOE BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, STRAPS FOR LUGGAGE AND HANDBAGS, SUIT BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TEXTILES AND TEXTILE GOODS, NAMELY, BED BLANKETS, BED LINEN, BED PADS, CHEMICAL FIBRE FABRICS, CHENILLE FABRIC, CLOTH BANNERS, CLOTH BUNTING, CLOTH LABELS, COTTON FABRIC, CURTAIN FABRIC, ESPARTO FABRIC, FIBRE GLASS FABRIC FOR TEXTILE USE, FLANNEL, GAUZE FABRIC, HAND TOWELS, JEANS FABRIC, JERSEY FABRICS FOR CLOTHING, KITCHEN TOWELS, KITCHEN LINENS, MATTRESS COVERS AND PADS, NYLON FABRIC, PILLOW COVERS, PILLOW SHAMS, POLYESTER FABRIC, SILK BASE MIXED FABRICS, TABLE CLOTHS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | BUTTONS FOR CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |