USPTO serial 79013563
THERMO WHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3171692Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THERMO WHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Non-electric whisks for whipping cream and apparatus for whipping cream namely cream whippers for food service and household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |