Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 79013566?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/79013566. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A.?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 79013566, the listed owner(s) include: CASTELLO Y JUAN, S.A., HORNO DEL ESPINAR, S.L..

What is USPTO serial number 79013566?

Serial number 79013566 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A.. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A.?

CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A. (79013566) currently shows USPTO status code 402 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A.?

The public record lists International Classes: 030. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A. Serial# 79013566 | status 402; last event DENA | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
030	Almond cookies, sponge cakes, muffins, puff pastries and croissants	SECTION 70 - CANCELLED	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jan 8, 2016	DENA	NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED	—
Jan 7, 2016	DETH	DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION	—
Dec 21, 2012	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
May 13, 2010	FINT	FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB	—
Apr 23, 2010	FICS	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB	—
Apr 23, 2010	FICR	FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Apr 23, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2008	CHLD	CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB	—
Sep 17, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2008	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Feb 28, 2008	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Aug 28, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Feb 22, 2007	OPNX	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB	—
Feb 22, 2007	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Feb 8, 2007	OPNS	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB	—
Feb 8, 2007	OPNR	NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB	—
Jan 17, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Jan 17, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 30, 2006	NREP	NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED	—
Jun 27, 2006	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Jun 27, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Jun 9, 2006	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Jun 9, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 22, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 22, 2006	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2006	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
May 22, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jan 27, 2006	RFNT	REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB	—
Jan 10, 2006	RFCS	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB	—
Jan 5, 2006	RFCR	NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW	—
Jan 4, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 12, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—
Sep 8, 2005	REPR	SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB	—

CASTELLÓ CASTELLÓ Y JUAN S.A.