USPTO serial 79013570
INTECRIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3159024Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with INTECRIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside PlazaSuite 1500Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing and computer apparatus, in particular apparatus for entering and editing data, expansion cards for electronic information processing apparatus, computer memories, program interface boards for inputting and editing data, blank storage media, namely, blank computer disks, CD's and tapes, and computer programs stored thereon, namely computer operating programs, computer programs for document management and computer programs for use in database management, spreadsheet and word processing; data processing computer programs, computer programs to help in producing software and for the configuration of hardware systems, software development tools to mold functions with computer apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETAS GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ETAS Entwicklungs- und Applikationswerkzeuge für elektronische Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by ETAS Entwicklungs- und Applikationswerkzeuge für elektronische Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTECRIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 31, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |