Drawing for SCALA DEI

USPTO serial 79013603

SCALA DEI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237533Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SCALA DEI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST

LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines [, sparkling wines, hard ciders, vermouths, aperitifs, eaux-de-vie, liqueurs, alcoholic punches and wine punches, alcoholic coffee-based beverage with distilled cream liquor, brandy, rum, whisky, vodka, distilled spirits ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 24, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 26, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 18, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 18, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 18, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 13, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 1, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 30, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 7, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 7, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 7, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
May 7, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 18, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 4, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 18, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 14, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance