Drawing for MILK_SHAKE

USPTO serial 79013651

MILK_SHAKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445338Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MILK_SHAKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Perfumes, toilet soaps; cosmetics, namely, deodorants for personal use, creams, lotions and oils for the face and body, cleansing milks, creams and oils, make-up for the face and body, make-up creams, beauty masks, make-up removers, eye shadows, lipsticks, mascara, rouge, make-up pencils for eyes and lips, cosmetic powders, blush, ] non-medicated cosmetic creams, oils and lotions for sun-tanning and after-sun exposure, [ pre- and after-shave creams and lotions, talcum powders, ] bath salts, bath foams and oils, [ after-bath body creams and lotions, ] depilatory preparations, nail polishes; hair shampoos, hair lotions, hair conditioners, hair sprays, hair gels, hair coloring creams, hair care preparations [ ; and dentifrices ]ACTIVE
008[ Hairdresser's scissors, hand-operated cosmetic implements and parts therefor, namely, manicure and pedicure scissors, tweezers, files, nail clippers; razors ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED
021[Combs, hairbrushes,] Cosmetic brushes[, shaving brushes, nail brushes, sponges for household and cosmetic purposes]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 15, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 18, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 12, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Feb 7, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 25, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 12, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 9, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 9, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 9, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 9, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 8, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 26, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Apr 30, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 18, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 6, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 17, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 28, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 15, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 2, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 3, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 3, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 12, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 6, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance