Drawing for MARSHAL BLEND TYPE FULL FLAVOR

USPTO serial 79013694

MARSHAL BLEND TYPE FULL FLAVOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARSHAL BLEND TYPE FULL FLAVOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery

James M. Slattery Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch LLPPO Box 747Falls Church, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034CigarettesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 4, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 29, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 15, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 15, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 15, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Dec 15, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 15, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Nov 7, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 2, 2008OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Oct 2, 2008OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Jul 2, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 26, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 26, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 25, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 17, 2007PBMRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST
Jul 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 8, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance