Drawing for WELL KEY

USPTO serial 79013770

WELL KEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELL KEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan L. Long

Michael D. Adams Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP71 South Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hydraulic and electric conveyors and replacement parts and fittings thereof, for use in oil or gas drilling and on oil or gas-wells for both land and off-shore applications; hydraulic and electrically driven machine tools, namely, machine tools for use in anchoring and loosening of mechanical devices in oil and gas wells, and replacement parts thereof; hydraulic and electrically driven machine tools for collecting and removing debris from oil and gas wells and replacement parts thereofSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Apparatus for controlling hydraulic and electric pressure, depth and flow measure for mechanical hydraulic and electric locking devices for use in pulling coiled tubing and wirelines in oil and gas drilling and on oil or gas-wells for both land and off-shore applications and replacement parts thereof; apparatus for controlling hydraulic and electric devices for use in anchoring and loosening of mechanical devices in oil and gas wells; apparatus for controlling hydraulic and electric devices for use in the loosening and removal of debris in oil and gas wells; replacement parts and fittings for the aforementioned goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Oil well and gas well repair and installation servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 18, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 17, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 17, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 17, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 16, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2009GECGACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 5, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 8, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 8, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 7, 2008GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Jul 7, 2008GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Jul 7, 2008CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Oct 11, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 4, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 24, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 31, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 31, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 9, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance