USPTO serial 79013776
SIKAGRIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3123855Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 1, 2006
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SIKAGRIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Visser
Michelle L. Visser Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for the building industry, namely, chemicals for curing concrete; cement additives for use in making and improving cement, namely, milling additives | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | [ Cement mixes for the construction industry and building materials of cement ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sika AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sika Technology AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sika AG
- Other trademarks owned by Sika AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named SIKAGRIND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |