Drawing for VARANGER RED KING CRAB FROM NORWAY

USPTO serial 79013830

VARANGER RED KING CRAB FROM NORWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228027Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARANGER RED KING CRAB FROM NORWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, edible oils and fatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
031Live animals, namely, fish, shellfish, crab, lobster, crawfish; spawnSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
043Services for providing food and drink; providing temporary accommodationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 2, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 23, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 15, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 15, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 28, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 30, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Oct 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 4, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance