USPTO serial 79013834
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner,
Mark A. Steiner, Duane Morris LLPSpear Tower, One Market Plaza, Ste. 2200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1127UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motorized scooters, motorcycles, mopeds, [ motor bicycles; bodies, frames, and chassis, all for two-wheeled motor vehicles; suspension systems, shock absorbers, brakes, steering mechanisms, seats, saddles, directional signals, all being parts of two-wheeled motor vehicles; anti-theft alarms for two-wheeled motor vehicles ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 12, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |