USPTO serial 79013844
PYROFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373169Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PYROFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines using biomass, organic residues, or waste material, for electric power generation by gasification at high temperatures and by driving a gas motor | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pyroforce Energietechnologie AG
- Other trademarks owned by Pyroforce Energietechnologie AG
- Other trademarks owned by Pyroforce Energietechnologie AG
- Other trademarks owned by GemperlePartners AG
- Other trademarks owned by Ursula Gemperle-Bühlmann
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named PYROFORCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |