Drawing for CYBERDISTY E-LEADER IN SEMICONDUCTOR

USPTO serial 79014015

CYBERDISTY E-LEADER IN SEMICONDUCTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3093458Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 16, 2006
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERDISTY E-LEADER IN SEMICONDUCTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALBERT L. SCHMEISER

ALBERT L SCHMEISER SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS LLP18 E UNIVERSITY DR #101MESA, AZ 85201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising agencies; on-line advertising on a computer network; news clipping services; commercial information agencies; market research; provision of business data; research of business data; compilation of information into computer databases; systemization of information into computer databases; providing statistical information for business or commercial purposes; import and export agencies; purchasing and procurement services, namely, procuring of contracts for others for the purchase of goods and labor contracting services; retail stores, wholesale stores, and on-line retail store services all featuring electronic parts, namely, semi-conductor elements for electronic devices, modems, microprocessors, computer memories, disk drives for computers, diodes, semi-conductors, wafers, integrated circuits, thermistors, transistors, print circuit boards, capacitors, resistors, integrated circuits for communications and integrated circuits for displays.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 19, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 11, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 9, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 7, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 11, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 16, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance