Drawing for AP

USPTO serial 79014063

AP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3258833Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Lyhus

VILLAGE NIKOLAEVSKOE, ZHOVTNEVIY RAION UA-57262 NIKOLAEVSKAYA OBLASTLIMITED LABILITY COMPANY SANDORA,UKRAINE

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic fruit drinks; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; drinking waters; table waters; mineral waters; fruit nectars; vegetable juices; syrups for beverages; fruit juice; tomato juice; non-alcoholic sweet ciderSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 15, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 9, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 9, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Oct 7, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 7, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 2, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 10, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 22, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 8, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance