Drawing for GOBOOKINGS

USPTO serial 79014075

GOBOOKINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3395032Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 11, 2008
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOBOOKINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil B. Friedman

Neil B. Friedman Hodgson Russ, LLP605 3rd Avenue, Suite 2300New York, NY 10158UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line interactive, non-downloadable software, for use in automated scheduling and bookings of appointments and resources for use by individuals or businessesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 8, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 25, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Dec 23, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Dec 19, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 21, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 11, 2014CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Mar 4, 2014EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Aug 5, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Aug 5, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Aug 5, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Aug 2, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 30, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 13, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 22, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Sep 20, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 19, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 12, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance