USPTO serial 79014087
EKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3318396Status 707Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE
SE
Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V.
Arnhem NL-6824 BM, NL
Other trademarks owned by Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V.
Akzo Nobel Pulp and Performance Chemicals AB
SE
Other trademarks owned by Akzo Nobel Pulp and Performance Chemicals AB
Nouryon Chemicals International B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by Nouryon Chemicals International B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Henscheid
Deborah Henscheid Lorenz & Kopf, LLP7010 E. Cochise Rd.Scottsdale, AZ 85253UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the pulp and paper industry, in particular pulp bleaching chemicals, [ retention and dewatering chemicals, internal and surface sizing chemicals, coating chemicals, wet strength chemicals, chemicals for use in tissue and fluff production and deinking chemicals; ] chemicals separation products, in particular [ silica; ] sodium chlorate, chlorine dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, [ peracetic acid, percarbonate, cationic polymers, anionic trash catchers, silica sols, colophony resin dispersions, hydrophobic ketene dimmers, hydrophobic acid anhydrides, polyamidoamine epichlorohydrin, polyurethane dispersions, sodium and potassium hydroxide, polyaluminium chlorides, iron chlorides, ammonium zirconium carbonate and colophony resins ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | [ Machines for the production of chemicals for industrial use ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ Apparatus, namely, processing analyzers in the nature of gas, liquid, liquid suspension and solid substance analyzers for the monitoring and control of processing and manufacturing plants; instruments for measuring compositional, physical, chemical, electrochemical, electrical and optical properties of gasses, liquids, liquid suspensions and solid substances; computer or microprocessor control systems containing computer hardware and software sold as a unit for monitoring or controlling manufacturing processes; all of the foregoing for use in the monitoring or control of processing and manufacturing plants, the monitoring or control of paper making machines, the monitoring or control of pulp and paper manufacturing or pulp bleaching processes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and engineering of equipment and plants for the manufacturing of chemicals; technical monitoring services for the operation of industrial processing and manufacturing plants and equipment; Providing technical advice on improving of pulp bleaching [ and paper making ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eka Chemicals AB
- Other trademarks owned by Eka Chemicals AB
- Other trademarks owned by Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Akzo Nobel Pulp and Performance Chemicals AB
- Other trademarks owned by Nouryon Chemicals International B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EKA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |