Drawing for DESIGN COMPILER 43

USPTO serial 79014127

DESIGN COMPILER 43

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESIGN COMPILER 43?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen T. Olson

STEPHEN T OLSON HARNESS DICKEY & PIERCE PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in the mechanical engineering industry, automobile, aircraft and aerospace, satellite, machine industry, manufacturing industry and for industrial planning, for the integration, uniform processing, calculation, representation and linking of information from various data processing programs and sources of reference; computers; data processing devices, namely, analogue and digital computersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 22, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2012MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 5, 2012ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 5, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 5, 2012OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 17, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance