Drawing for TAMALITA

USPTO serial 79014328

TAMALITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3288276Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 4, 2007
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAMALITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORMAN P. SOLOWAY

Norman P. Soloway HAYES SOLOWAY P.C.4640 E. SKYLINE DRIVETUCSON, AZ 85718-3230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded videotapes featuring music; blank ROM permanent storage CD's; pre-recorded compact-discs featuring music; pre-recorded audio and video compact-discs featuring music; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring music; pre-recorded optical data carriers featuring musicSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
016Labels; stickers; pictures; heat transfer paper; paintings, framed or unframed; books, namely songbooks and poetry books; graphical designs printed on paper; paper covers namely for compact-discs; paper flags; paper streamers; photographs; note cards; and occasion cardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041Organizing cultural exhibitions; motion picture film production; photography services; radio entertainment production; entertainment in the nature of musical shows; publishing of books and magazines; entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; entertainment in the nature of dance performances and ballet performances; educational services, namely conducting seminars or workshops in the field of music or psychologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 6, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 11, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 24, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 21, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Nov 8, 2005CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Oct 27, 2005CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 5, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance