USPTO serial 79014379
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London NW11 0PH, GB
London NW11 0PH, GB
London NW11 0PH, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat fish, poultry and game, namely microwave prepared meals comprised of chicken and meat curries; prepared meals composed of vegetables, meat, chicken and combinations thereof and microwave ready vegetarian curries; snack foods, namely chips made from fruit, potatoes, and vegetables, dhals; Indian snack food, namely mix of lentils, nuts and deep-fried strands of gram flour; prepared nuts and mixtures of prepared nuts and dried fruits; pickles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flour; dried or cooked pasta; rice; noodles; processed cereals; processed grains; bread, papadums, naan bread; herbal tea not for medicinal use, tea, cocoa, coffee and flavoring syrups; biscuits, cakes; chutneys, ready made sauces, salt for food; vinegar; food flavoring not in the nature of essential oils; spices, seasonings in the nature of savory pastes; popcorn; spiced tea | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters; fruit and vegetable drinks and juices; soya-based beverages not being milk substitutes, non-alcoholic beverages namely fruit and coconut juice drinks and soft drinks flavored with spiced tea | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 2, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |