Drawing for SITAR

USPTO serial 79014379

SITAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3265258Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2007
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SITAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat fish, poultry and game, namely microwave prepared meals comprised of chicken and meat curries; prepared meals composed of vegetables, meat, chicken and combinations thereof and microwave ready vegetarian curries; snack foods, namely chips made from fruit, potatoes, and vegetables, dhals; Indian snack food, namely mix of lentils, nuts and deep-fried strands of gram flour; prepared nuts and mixtures of prepared nuts and dried fruits; picklesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Flour; dried or cooked pasta; rice; noodles; processed cereals; processed grains; bread, papadums, naan bread; herbal tea not for medicinal use, tea, cocoa, coffee and flavoring syrups; biscuits, cakes; chutneys, ready made sauces, salt for food; vinegar; food flavoring not in the nature of essential oils; spices, seasonings in the nature of savory pastes; popcorn; spiced teaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032Mineral and aerated waters; fruit and vegetable drinks and juices; soya-based beverages not being milk substitutes, non-alcoholic beverages namely fruit and coconut juice drinks and soft drinks flavored with spiced teaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 2, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 2, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Oct 21, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2008LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Nov 20, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 4, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Sep 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance