Drawing for CAION

USPTO serial 79014472

CAION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3230014Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2007
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Moore

THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN 4TH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automatic teller, vending and gambling machines for use in casinos for depositing, withdrawing and/or changing of money, for input, output, charging, and/or recharging of magnetic cards and/or chip cards and/or vouchers, for verifying the authenticity and/or validity of money, cards and/or vouchers for use in cashless gambling machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 31, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 22, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 22, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance