USPTO serial 79014492
BINDLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3291087Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2007
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BINDLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH
CH-9240 Uzwil, CH
CH-9240 Uzwil, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thilo C. Agthe
Thilo C. Agthe Wuersch & Gering LLP100 Wall Street, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food processing machine, in particular machines for processing cocoa and chocolate; roller mills; mixer mills, namely shaft mixer; sterile crystallization facilities, namely tanks composed of steel as a component of a crystallization facility for the purpose of generating cocoa butter crystal seeds; mechanical mixing machines; conches for chocolate masses and frostings, namely machines used for refining of chocolate mass | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments, namely computers for recording data from machines and facilities as well as data specific to process for manufacturing cocoa and chocolate goods; apparatus and instruments, namely electric control panels for controlling and regulating mixers, mills, conches; apparatus and instruments, namely, automatic switch boards with technical low-current elements for regulating mixers, mills conches; apparatus and installations for process monitoring, namely computers for manufacturing chocolate articles; dosage facilities, namely dosing units and scales for metering and dosing cocoa powder, sugar, cocoa butter, nuts and other ingredients of a chocolate | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Scientific and technological research services; design relating to cocoa and chocolate processing devices; industrial analysis and research in the field of processing cocoa and chocolate; design and development of computer hardware and software; legal services ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bühler AG
- Other trademarks owned by Bühler AG
- Other trademarks owned by Bühler AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BINDLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 11, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |