Drawing for DNX

USPTO serial 79014506

DNX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3635414Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 9, 2009
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DNX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Nelson

Jeffrey A. Nelson SpyHop Law PLLC115 2nd Street, #1050Langley, WA 98260-9850United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Sporting articles and apparatus, namely, tennis racquets [, squash racquets, racquetball rackets, badminton racquets, skis, snowboards, ski poles, ski bindings and snowboard bindings ]; parts and accessories of sporting articles and apparatus, namely, [ frames, ] grip bands [ and strings ] for racquets [ and covers for racquets, skis and snowboards ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2026ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Jul 2, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 9, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 9, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 3, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 23, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 7, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 14, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Feb 15, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 15, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 15, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 15, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 22, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 23, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 15, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 16, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 14, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 14, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 14, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 21, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 21, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 13, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
May 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 23, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Oct 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance