Drawing for EPLOY

USPTO serial 79014521

EPLOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3206370Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2007
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPLOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, computer software for database management for use in the fields of human resources and personnel recruitingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer software design for others and computer web site design for othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 4, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 9, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 26, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 26, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 25, 2018PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Dec 9, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2017PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 2, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 2, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 1, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 31, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance