Drawing for SUPERROUBAIX

USPTO serial 79014536

SUPERROUBAIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERROUBAIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman and Harvey B. Jacobson, Simor L. Moskowitz, Allen S. Melser, Michael R. Slobasky, Marsha G. Gentner, Jonathan L. Scherer, George W. Lewis, William E. Player, and Nathaniel A. Humphries

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Fabrics for the manufacture of clothing and furnishing, curtains, pillow cases, bed sheets, bed spreads, bed blankets, comforters for bed, table clothes not of paper, textile napkins, towels, textile place matsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, namely, coats, mantles, raincoats, dresses, suits, skirts, jackets, trousers, jeans, waistcoats, shirts, t-shirts, blouses, jerseys, sweaters, blazers, cardigans, stockings, socks, underwear, corsets, night-gowns, pajamas, bathrobes, bathing suits, sun suits, sport jackets, wind-resistant jackets, anoraks, sweatsuits, ties, neckties, scarves, shawls, foulards, caps, hats, gloves, sashes, belts; footwear, boots, shoes and slippersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 3, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 20, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 31, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 30, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 29, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 5, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 1, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 1, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 3, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 26, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 16, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 16, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 20, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 20, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 19, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 31, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance