Drawing for RICARDA M.

USPTO serial 79014659

RICARDA M.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3165435Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 31, 2006
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with RICARDA M.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Chinlund

Gregory J. Chinlund MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, essential oils, [ perfumery ]ACTIVE
008[ Hand tools and implements, namely, ] nail filesACTIVE
044[ Beauty salons ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 25, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 14, 2017INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Dec 14, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 14, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 14, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 11, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 11, 2016E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 22, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 22, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 27, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 27, 201271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Sep 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 4, 201271AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Sep 4, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 15, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 22, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance