Drawing for NANOTIER

USPTO serial 79014667

NANOTIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3168928Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 7, 2006
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOTIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical machines for use in the semiconductor industry, particularly for the manufacture of semiconductors and for the deposition of thin films; electronically operated machines for the manufacture of semiconductor wafers and for the deposition of thin films; parts for aforesaid goods.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Chemical semiconductor wafer processing equipment, namely thermal treatment reactors, chemical vapor deposition reactors, also operating with electric gas discharge; electronically controlled chemical equipment for the manufacture of semiconductors and for the deposition of thin films; parts for aforesaid goods.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 22, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 22, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 18, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 26, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 2, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance