Drawing for SCENT OF SPIRIT

USPTO serial 79014668

SCENT OF SPIRIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223207Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCENT OF SPIRIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tomoko Nakajima

TOMOKO NAKAJIMA RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC1233 20TH ST STE 501WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Adhesives for affixing false hair, adhesives for affixing false eyelashes, skin soap, deodorant soap, liquid soap, hand soap, hair shampoo, facial cleanser, dentifrices, face powder, skin lotions, creams for skin care, rouge, non-medicated toiletries, eau de Cologne, liquid perfumes, incenses, false nails, false eyelashesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 25, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 2, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 1, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 1, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 13, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007ISIRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 31, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 19, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 14, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance