Drawing for CANPOWER

USPTO serial 79014676

CANPOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3187571Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANPOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

THILO C AGTHE WUERSCH & GERING LLP100 WALL ST 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ combustion engines for boats and power generation; clutches and power transmissions for machines and for use with internal combustion engines for boats and power generation ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Measuring and control devices for monitoring internal combustion engines and electric motors, namely, electronic sensors and computer software; computers and instruments for data processing, namely, performance and status monitoring computers and diagnostic devices comprised of graphic display units and electronic sensors for use with combustion engine, electric motors, hydraulic valves and power transmission units; performance and status monitoring computers and diagnostic devices comprised of electronic sensors for use with combustion engines, electric motors, hydraulic valves and power transmission units featuring the ability to send and receive data via SMS or GSM networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
012[ Internal combustion engines for land vehicles; clutches for land vehicles; transmissions for land vehicles ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 19, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 16, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 29, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 11, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 11, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 11, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Jan 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 17, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 2, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance