Drawing for BAUERMEISTER

USPTO serial 79014679

BAUERMEISTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3251909Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
MAYS, PAULA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BAUERMEISTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman B. Thot

Norman B. Thot Patent Law Offices of Dr. Norman B. ThotP.O. Box 10 17 56RATINGEN, 40837GERMANY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for crushing and processing solids, including oil seeds, manures, sugar, colour pigments, metal powders, coating powders, cosmetics, spices, plastics or similar materials, in particular rolling mills, coarse crushers, mills, air separators, grinding and fine grinding machines, conveying, sorting and dusting machines, grinding machines; parts and fittings for the aforesaid machines; machines for the cocoa and chocolate industry, in particular cleaning machines for cocoa beans, shelling machines, mills, cocoa mass processing and roasting machines, cocoa presses, coolers, mixing and kneading machines, rolling mills, conching machines; machines for the production of almond and nut preparations, including the roasting, shelling, oil-bath treatment and coating of nuts and almonds, production of pastes, production of raw masses, including the production of marzipan and persipanACTIVE—
037Construction and/or installation of industrial and mechanical equipment and production linesACTIVE—
042Engineering, namely the design and planning of industrial and mechanical equipment and production lines, and technical consultancy; Providing technical services, namely technical project engineering and concept development of machines and technology in the fields of industrial size reduction of solidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 3, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 3, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 1, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 11, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2013PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Oct 12, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 10, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 5, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Nov 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Oct 3, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance