Drawing for AUSTRALIS

USPTO serial 79014699

AUSTRALIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3187572Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
BEYER, ELIZABETH L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUSTRALIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark J. Ingber, Esq.

Mark J. Ingber, Esq. The Ingber Law Firm51 JFK Parkway1st Floor West, Suite 159Short Hills, NJ 07078

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Sunscreen and sun-block preparations, namely, skin lotions, body oils, sun sticks, skin creams and gels for skin; suntan preparations; ] sunless tanning preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations for protection of the skin; [ tan promoting preparations, namely, skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans; ] non-medicated skin care preparations incorporating a sunscreen or sun-block; cosmetics [ and hair care products, ] namely, rouge, lipstick, eyeliners, mascara, perfume, cologne, toilet soap, skin soap, [ talcum powder, ] skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin moisturizer, [ hair shampoo, hair conditioners, hair gel, hair spray, hair rinses, hair dye, hair waving lotion, hair styling preparations, ] body cream, body oil, body powder, [ aftershave lotions ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 18, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 16, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 26, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 26, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 16, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 21, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 16, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 16, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 15, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 18, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 14, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Aug 3, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 11, 2013EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2013PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Jan 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 17, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Dec 17, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 22, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance