Drawing for MOON

USPTO serial 79014772

MOON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Freezers, refrigerating apparatus and machines, refrigerating containers, ice machines and apparatus, refrigerating appliances and installations, cooling appliances and installations, refrigerators, air cooling apparatus, air conditioning installations, boilers, hot water heating installations, evaporators, gas boilers, steam boilers, oil boilersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 1, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2005RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2005NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance