Drawing for XTRAVUE

USPTO serial 79014800

XTRAVUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3225257Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2007
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTRAVUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary A. Donovan

MARY A. DONOVAN DONOVAN & YEE LLP161 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASSUITE 1201NEW YORK, NY 10013

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic equipment for use in automobile vehicles for the management of automobile lighting functions consisting of integrated circuit modules for projecting visible and infrared lighting, halogen lamp bulbs, infrared filters and software for processing signals of lighting parametersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Visible and infrared lighting systems for use in automobile vehicles for intelligent management of nocturnal road lighting consisting of software and sensors for processing signals of lighting parameters and light projectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 8, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 8, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 10, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED
Jul 7, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Jul 6, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 20, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Feb 20, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jan 25, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 5, 2007OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2007OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Nov 8, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance