Drawing for PIUMA

USPTO serial 79014809

PIUMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3177269Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2006
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with PIUMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Vern

Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP405 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10174UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
023Yarns and threads for textile use and sewing threads and yarns of all kindsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 3, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 3, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 6, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 2, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 14, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 29, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 29, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance