USPTO serial 79014843
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Argon; nitrogen; carbon monoxide; chlorine; dry ice; hydrogen; oxygen; acetic acids; sulfuric acid; alkalies; caustic alkali; hydrochloric acid; glacial acetic acid; propionic acid; ethanol; methanol; ethyl acetate; butyl acetate; azodicarbonide; calcium hypochlorite [; catalysts for use in manufacture of rubber, namely, rubber accelerator ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 14, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |