Drawing for MYOBRACE

USPTO serial 79014848

MYOBRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3228034Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MYOBRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah J. Peckham

Deborah J. Peckham Barclay Damon, LLP160 Federal Street, 10th FloorBoston, MA 02110United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Othodontic appliances and aids, namely, removable orthodontic appliances made of silicon or flexible nylon, and orthodontic archwire substitutes; training devices for teeth, namely, teeth petitioners, teeth trainers and bracesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 8, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 8, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 8, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 2, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 19, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Apr 17, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 28, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 13, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 10, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance