Drawing for BIMECC

USPTO serial 79014863

BIMECC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3159066Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIMECC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD M. GOLDBERG

RICHARD M. GOLDBERG Goldberg Patent Law Office25 East Salem StreetSuite 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006GOODS MADE OF METAL, namely, METAL BOLTS, [ METAL PLUGS AND ] METAL RIVETS; SCREWS, NAMELY, CROSS-HEAD SCREWS, AESTHETIC SCREWS FOR WHEELS; [ GOODS MADE OF METAL, namely, METAL STIRRUPS, CHIMNEY POTS; ] GOODS OF COMMON METAL, NAMELY, [ METAL ANCHOR BOLTS NOT BEING PARTS OF MACHINES, SAFETY DEPOSIT BOXES, FURNITURE CASTERS, METAL LICENSE PLATES FOR VEHICLES, HINGES, METAL BUNGS, FLANGES, PICKETS, ] SPLINES, PEGS FOR DRAG BARS, [ PEGS WITH FASTENING HEADS WITH LARGE HANDLES, EYE BOLTS AND ] SNAP RINGS FOR WIRE INTERIORS, METAL NUTS AND SCREWS FOR VEHICLE WHEELS; ALL OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED ITEMS BEING MADE OF METALSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
012[ PARTS AND ACCESSORIES FOR VEHICLES, NAMELY, TIRES OF ALUMINUM OR STEEL, VALVES FOR TIRES, ANTI-SKID TIRE CHAINS ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 5, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 2, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 2, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 2, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED
Jun 2, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED
Jun 2, 201271.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Jun 2, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 13, 201215AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED
Feb 13, 201271AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Feb 13, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2012E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 1, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance