USPTO serial 79014878
SCHENKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3215947Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2007
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHENKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
EDWARD M PRINCE ALSTON & BIRD LLP601 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Packaging and containers made of cardboard, paper, wood and plastic for transporting goods of all kinds; packaging materials made of paper, cardboard and plastic, namely, bags, pouches and wrapping paper; packaging foils made of plastic; printed materials, namely, business journals, posters, newspapers, postcards, business cards, address books and diaries; stationery; ink pads; stamping ink; letter openers; paper knives; letter trays; file folders; for letters and loose papers; desk pads; paper hole-punches; staplers; paper clips; staples; self-adhesive labels; plastic gift wrappings, bags, foils and self-adhesive foils; paperweights; and drawing and painting materials, namely, pencils, drawing pencils, pencil cases, pens, drawing pens and brushes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Plastic and wooden containers, namely crates, cases, boxes and pallets for commercial use; non-metal license plates for vehicles; non-metal nameplates; and wood or plastic signs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transportation of passengers and goods by motor vehicle, railroad, ship and aircraft; loading and unloading motor vehicles, railroad cars, ships and aircraft; storage of all kinds of goods; transport of money and valuables; packing of all kinds of goods, namely, re-packing and preparing goods for sale or onward transport; rental and storage of transport and storage wood, metal and plastic pallets and containers; and freight brokerage of transportation of goods by motor vehicles, railroad and ships | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche Bahn AG
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche Bahn AG
- Other trademarks owned by Deutsche Bahn AG
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named SCHENKER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | IRRE | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL REQUIRES EXAMINER REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |